2005 Ford Excursion vs. 1952 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2005 Ford Excursion is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher.
Because 2005 Ford Excursion is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Excursion will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Ford Excursion has automatic transmission and 1952 Rolls-Royce Phantom has manual transmission. 1952 Rolls-Royce Phantom will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Ford Excursion will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Excursion | 1952 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Excursion | Phantom |
Year Released | 2005 | 1952 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1960 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3490 mm | 3690 mm |