2005 Ford Excursion vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Excursion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Excursion would be higher. At 5,948 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford Excursion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XJ (503 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 2005 Ford Excursion. (325 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Excursion. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Excursion weights approximately 1134 kg more than 2013 Jaguar XJ.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Excursion (759 Nm) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Jaguar XJ. (625 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Excursion will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Jaguar XJ.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Excursion | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Excursion | XJ |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5948 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 503 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 759 Nm | 625 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 95 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 105 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 3504 kg | 2370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5760 mm | 5252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2105 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1456 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3490 mm | 3157 mm |