2005 Ford Expedition vs. 1954 Studebaker Commander
To start off, 2005 Ford Expedition is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Studebaker Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Studebaker Commander would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Expedition (300 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1954 Studebaker Commander. (140 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Expedition should accelerate faster than 1954 Studebaker Commander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Studebaker Commander weights approximately 122 kg more than 2005 Ford Expedition.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Expedition | 1954 Studebaker Commander | |
Make | Ford | Studebaker |
Model | Expedition | Commander |
Year Released | 2005 | 1954 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 3673 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 90.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 71.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 7.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 5200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 3070 mm |