2005 Ford Expedition vs. 1986 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 2005 Ford Expedition is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Plymouth Sundance. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Plymouth Sundance would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Expedition (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Expedition should accelerate faster than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Expedition weights approximately 75 kg more than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Ford Expedition is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Expedition. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Expedition | 1986 Plymouth Sundance | |
Make | Ford | Plymouth |
Model | Expedition | Sundance |
Year Released | 2005 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 2211 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2470 mm |