2005 Ford Explorer vs. 1963 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2005 Ford Explorer is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Explorer (210 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elan. (100 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Explorer weights approximately 1345 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Ford Explorer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Explorer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Explorer (321 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Lotus Elan. (138 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Explorer | 1963 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Ford | Lotus |
Model | Explorer | Elan |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 321 Nm | 138 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 100.5 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 72.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1939 kg | 594 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 45 L |