2005 Ford Explorer vs. 1963 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 2005 Ford Explorer is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Explorer (210 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Vitesse. (70 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Vitesse. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Explorer weights approximately 400 kg more than 1963 Triumph Vitesse. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Explorer (330 Nm) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Vitesse. (125 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Vitesse.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Explorer | 1963 Triumph Vitesse | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Explorer | Vitesse |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4014 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 125 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 66.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 8.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 40 L |