2005 Ford Explorer vs. 2000 Opel Omega
To start off, 2005 Ford Explorer is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Opel Omega would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Opel Omega (218 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2005 Ford Explorer. (210 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Explorer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Opel Omega weights approximately 430 kg more than 2005 Ford Explorer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Explorer (330 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Opel Omega. (290 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Explorer | 2000 Opel Omega | |
Make | Ford | Opel |
Model | Explorer | Omega |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4014 cc | 3175 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 218 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 290 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 8.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 75 L |