2005 Ford Explorer vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Explorer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Explorer would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Explorer (210 HP) has 62 more horse power than 2012 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Epica.
Because 2005 Ford Explorer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Explorer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Explorer (344 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Explorer | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Explorer | Epica |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 344 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |