2005 Ford Explorer vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Explorer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Explorer would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Explorer (210 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 2012 Renault Clio. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Explorer weights approximately 65 kg more than 2012 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Explorer (330 Nm) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Clio. (151 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Explorer | 2012 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Explorer | Clio |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4014 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 151 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1215 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 55 L |