2005 Ford Explorer vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLS
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Explorer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Explorer would be higher. At 6,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLS (575 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 365 more horse power than 2005 Ford Explorer. (210 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLS should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Explorer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLS weights approximately 384 kg more than 2005 Ford Explorer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLS (649 Nm) has 319 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Explorer. (330 Nm). This means 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Explorer.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Explorer | 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLS | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Explorer | SLS |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4014 cc | 6300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 575 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 649 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 11.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1664 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4638 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2075 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1261 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.2 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |