2005 Ford F-150 vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 2005 Ford F-150 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford F-150 (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford F-150 weights approximately 116 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford F-150 (325 Nm) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm). This means 2005 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford F-150 | 1963 Holden EJ | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | F-150 | EJ |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 163 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1134 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5370 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2680 mm |