2005 Ford F-150 vs. 1983 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2005 Ford F-150 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford F-150 (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 1983 Mazda RX-7. (105 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1983 Mazda RX-7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford F-150 weights approximately 1303 kg more than 1983 Mazda RX-7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford F-150 (495 Nm) has 350 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mazda RX-7. (145 Nm). This means 2005 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford F-150 | 1983 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | F-150 | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 495 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2363 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5540 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3370 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 65 L |