2005 Ford F-150 vs. 1986 Peugeot 309
To start off, 2005 Ford F-150 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Peugeot 309. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Peugeot 309 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford F-150 (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1986 Peugeot 309. (67 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1986 Peugeot 309. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford F-150 weights approximately 260 kg more than 1986 Peugeot 309. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Ford F-150 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford F-150. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Peugeot 309, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford F-150 (325 Nm) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Peugeot 309. (118 Nm). This means 2005 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Peugeot 309.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford F-150 | 1986 Peugeot 309 | |
Make | Ford | Peugeot |
Model | F-150 | 309 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1905 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 118 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 23.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5370 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2480 mm |