2005 Ford F-150 vs. 1992 Rover 800
To start off, 2005 Ford F-150 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 800 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford F-150 (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1992 Rover 800. (167 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford F-150 weights approximately 839 kg more than 1992 Rover 800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Ford F-150 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford F-150. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Rover 800, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford F-150 (495 Nm) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 800. (225 Nm). This means 2005 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 800.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford F-150 | 1992 Rover 800 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | F-150 | 800 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1992 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 2675 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 167 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 495 Nm | 225 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90.1 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2363 kg | 1524 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5540 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3370 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 4.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 68 L |