2005 Ford F-150 vs. 2006 Mercury Mountaineer
To start off, 2006 Mercury Mountaineer is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford F-150 (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2006 Mercury Mountaineer. (293 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mercury Mountaineer.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford F-150 (496 Nm) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mercury Mountaineer. (407 Nm). This means 2005 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mercury Mountaineer.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford F-150 | 2006 Mercury Mountaineer | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | F-150 | Mountaineer |
Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 293 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 496 Nm | 407 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 90.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 90 mm |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5540 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3370 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 85 L |