2005 Ford F-150 vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac XTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2005 Ford F-150. (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford F-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford F-150 weights approximately 546 kg more than 2013 Cadillac XTS.
Because 2005 Ford F-150 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford F-150. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford F-150 (495 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac XTS. (358 Nm). This means 2005 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac XTS.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford F-150 | 2013 Cadillac XTS | |
Make | Ford | Cadillac |
Model | F-150 | XTS |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 314 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 495 Nm | 358 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90.1 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 11.5 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2363 kg | 1817 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5540 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1852 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3370 mm | 2837 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 72 L |