2005 Ford F-250 vs. 1996 Rover 400
To start off, 2005 Ford F-250 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 400 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford F-250 (296 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1996 Rover 400. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 400.
Because 2005 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Rover 400. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford F-250 (495 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 350 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 400. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford F-250 | 1996 Rover 400 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | F-250 | 400 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 495 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5760 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3490 mm | 2560 mm |