2005 Ford F-350 vs. 1949 Hudson Commodore
To start off, 2005 Ford F-350 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford F-350 (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1949 Hudson Commodore. (128 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 1949 Hudson Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Hudson Commodore weights approximately 406 kg more than 2005 Ford F-350.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford F-350 | 1949 Hudson Commodore | |
| Make | Ford | Hudson |
| Model | F-350 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5408 cc | 4166 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 114.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 6.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1656 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5880 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3610 mm | 3160 mm |
