2005 Ford F-350 vs. 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 Ford F-350 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford F-350 (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (160 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford F-350 (495 Nm) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (251 Nm). This means 2005 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford F-350 | 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
Model | F-350 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2005 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 3344 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 495 Nm | 251 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5880 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1970 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3610 mm | 2670 mm |