2005 Ford F-350 vs. 1978 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2005 Ford F-350 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 6,801 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford F-350 (362 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 288 more horse power than 1978 Nissan Cedric. (74 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 1978 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 142 kg more than 2005 Ford F-350.
Because 2005 Ford F-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Nissan Cedric. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford F-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford F-350 (621 Nm) has 474 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Nissan Cedric. (147 Nm). This means 2005 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford F-350 | 1978 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | F-350 | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6801 cc | 1982 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 362 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 621 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6240 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2430 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3970 mm | 2700 mm |
