2005 Ford F-350 vs. 1996 Nissan Crew
To start off, 2005 Ford F-350 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Nissan Crew. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Nissan Crew would be higher. At 6,801 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford F-350 (362 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 233 more horse power than 1996 Nissan Crew. (129 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 1996 Nissan Crew. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Nissan Crew weights approximately 32 kg more than 2005 Ford F-350.
Because 2005 Ford F-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Nissan Crew. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford F-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford F-350 (621 Nm) has 446 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Nissan Crew. (175 Nm). This means 2005 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Nissan Crew.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford F-350 | 1996 Nissan Crew | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | F-350 | Crew |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6801 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 362 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 621 Nm | 175 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1240 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6240 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2430 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3970 mm | 2670 mm |