2005 Ford F-350 vs. 1996 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2005 Ford F-350 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Oldsmobile SS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Oldsmobile SS would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford F-350 (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1996 Oldsmobile SS. (238 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 1996 Oldsmobile SS.
Because 2005 Ford F-350 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford F-350. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford F-350 (495 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Oldsmobile SS. (380 Nm). This means 2005 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Oldsmobile SS.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford F-350 | 1996 Oldsmobile SS | |
Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
Model | F-350 | SS |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 495 Nm | 380 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 96.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 86.4 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5880 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1970 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3610 mm | 2820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 110 L | 68 L |