2005 Ford F-350 vs. 2002 Holden UTE
To start off, 2005 Ford F-350 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Holden UTE would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford F-350 (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 2002 Holden UTE. (204 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 2002 Holden UTE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Holden UTE weights approximately 250 kg more than 2005 Ford F-350.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford F-350 (495 Nm) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Holden UTE. (306 Nm). This means 2005 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford F-350 | 2002 Holden UTE | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | F-350 | UTE |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 204 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 495 Nm | 306 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5880 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1970 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3610 mm | 2950 mm |