2005 Ford F-350 vs. 2009 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford F-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford F-350 would be higher. At 6,801 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (420 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2005 Ford F-350. (362 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford F-350.
Because 2005 Ford F-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Jaguar XF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford F-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford F-350 (621 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Jaguar XF. (560 Nm). This means 2005 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Jaguar XF.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford F-350 | 2009 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | F-350 | XF |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6801 cc | 4196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 362 HP | 420 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 621 Nm | 560 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 6240 mm | 4970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2430 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3970 mm | 2910 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 110 L | 70 L |
