2005 Ford F-350 vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford F-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford F-350 would be higher. At 6,801 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford F-350 (362 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2012 Cadillac CTS. (270 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 2012 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 540 kg more than 2005 Ford F-350.

Because 2005 Ford F-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford F-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford F-350 (621 Nm) has 319 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Cadillac CTS. (302 Nm). This means 2005 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Cadillac CTS.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Ford F-350 2012 Cadillac CTS
Make Ford Cadillac
Model F-350 CTS
Year Released 2005 2012
Body Type Pickup Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6801 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 10 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 3 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 362 HP 270 HP
Engine RPM 6250 RPM 7000 RPM
Torque 621 Nm 302 Nm
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Number of Seats 6 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1208 kg 1748 kg
Vehicle Length 6240 mm 4859 mm
Vehicle Width 2430 mm 1842 mm
Vehicle Height 2040 mm 1473 mm
Wheelbase Size 3970 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 110 L 68 L