2005 Ford Fairlane vs. 1973 Matra-Simca M670
To start off, 2005 Ford Fairlane is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Matra-Simca M670. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Matra-Simca M670 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Matra-Simca M670 (445 HP @ 11000 RPM) has 220 more horse power than 2005 Ford Fairlane. (225 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Matra-Simca M670 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 1025 kg more than 1973 Matra-Simca M670.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Ford Fairlane has automatic transmission and 1973 Matra-Simca M670 has manual transmission. 1973 Matra-Simca M670 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Ford Fairlane will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Fairlane | 1973 Matra-Simca M670 | |
| Make | Ford | Matra-Simca |
| Model | Fairlane | M670 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1973 |
| Engine Size | 3984 cc | 2999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 445 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 11000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 680 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2570 mm |
