2005 Ford Fairlane vs. 1984 Pontiac Trans Am
To start off, 2005 Ford Fairlane is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Pontiac Trans Am. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Pontiac Trans Am would be higher. At 4,998 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Pontiac Trans Am is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Ford Fairlane has automatic transmission and 1984 Pontiac Trans Am has manual transmission. 1984 Pontiac Trans Am will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Ford Fairlane will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Fairlane | 1984 Pontiac Trans Am | |
Make | Ford | Pontiac |
Model | Fairlane | Trans Am |
Year Released | 2005 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3984 cc | 4998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 92.3 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.3 mm | 88.9 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2570 mm |