2005 Ford Fairlane vs. 2001 Nissan MM
To start off, 2005 Ford Fairlane is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan MM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan MM would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Fairlane (225 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 2001 Nissan MM. (153 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan MM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan MM weights approximately 130 kg more than 2005 Ford Fairlane.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan MM (372 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Fairlane. (370 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan MM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Fairlane.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Fairlane | 2001 Nissan MM | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Fairlane | MM |
Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3984 cc | 2956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 370 Nm | 372 Nm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1835 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 1530 mm |