2005 Ford Falcon vs. 1950 Saab 92
To start off, 2005 Ford Falcon is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Saab 92 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Falcon (200 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1950 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1950 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Falcon weights approximately 776 kg more than 1950 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Falcon | 1950 Saab 92 | |
Make | Ford | Saab |
Model | Falcon | 92 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1950 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3984 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1581 kg | 805 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2480 mm |