2005 Ford Falcon vs. 1952 Ford Crestline
To start off, 2005 Ford Falcon is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Falcon (220 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1952 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Falcon weights approximately 50 kg more than 1952 Ford Crestline. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Falcon | 1952 Ford Crestline | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Falcon | Crestline |
Year Released | 2005 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3984 cc | 3929 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2940 mm |