2005 Ford Falcon vs. 1964 Seat 1500
To start off, 2005 Ford Falcon is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Falcon (200 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1964 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1964 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Falcon weights approximately 421 kg more than 1964 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Falcon | 1964 Seat 1500 | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | Falcon | 1500 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3984 cc | 1481 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1581 kg | 1160 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2660 mm |