2005 Ford Falcon vs. 1966 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 2005 Ford Falcon is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Falcon (200 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1966 Plymouth Valiant. (100 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1966 Plymouth Valiant.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Falcon | 1966 Plymouth Valiant | |
| Make | Ford | Plymouth |
| Model | Falcon | Valiant |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3984 cc | 2789 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2700 mm |
