2005 Ford Falcon vs. 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2005 Ford Falcon is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 615 kg more than 2005 Ford Falcon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Falcon | 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Falcon | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3984 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 2100 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 109 L |
