2005 Ford Falcon vs. 1970 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2005 Ford Falcon is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Falcon (200 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1970 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1970 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Falcon weights approximately 336 kg more than 1970 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Falcon | 1970 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Falcon | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3984 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 357 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1581 kg | 1245 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2700 mm |
