2005 Ford Falcon vs. 1978 Skoda L
To start off, 2005 Ford Falcon is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Skoda L would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Falcon (200 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1978 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1978 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Falcon weights approximately 756 kg more than 1978 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 283 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Falcon | 1978 Skoda L | |
Make | Ford | Skoda |
Model | Falcon | L |
Year Released | 2005 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3984 cc | 1046 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 357 Nm | 74 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92.4 mm | 68.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.3 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 8.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1581 kg | 825 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 38 L |