2005 Ford Falcon vs. 1981 Audi 4000
To start off, 2005 Ford Falcon is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Falcon (200 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1981 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1981 Audi 4000.
Because 1981 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Falcon (357 Nm) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Falcon | 1981 Audi 4000 | |
Make | Ford | Audi |
Model | Falcon | 4000 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3984 cc | 2144 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 357 Nm | 137 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92.4 mm | 79.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.3 mm | 86.4 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2550 mm |