2005 Ford Falcon vs. 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 2005 Ford Falcon is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Falcon (200 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. (175 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Falcon weights approximately 111 kg more than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. (251 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Falcon | 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Falcon | Sigma |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3984 cc | 2972 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 175 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 357 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1581 kg | 1470 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2730 mm |
