2005 Ford Falcon vs. 1994 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2005 Ford Falcon is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Falcon (200 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1994 Ford Tempo. (96 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Falcon weights approximately 411 kg more than 1994 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Tempo. (171 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Falcon | 1994 Ford Tempo | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Falcon | Tempo |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3984 cc | 2307 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 357 Nm | 171 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 92.4 mm | 93.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 99.3 mm | 84 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1581 kg | 1170 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2540 mm |
