2005 Ford Falcon vs. 1996 Mazda Familia
To start off, 2005 Ford Falcon is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda Familia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda Familia would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Falcon weights approximately 491 kg more than 1996 Mazda Familia.
Because 2005 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda Familia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Falcon | 1996 Mazda Familia | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Falcon | Familia |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3984 cc | 1489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 92.4 mm | 75.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.3 mm | 83.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1581 kg | 1090 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |