2005 Ford Falcon vs. 1999 Suzuki C2
To start off, 2005 Ford Falcon is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Suzuki C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Suzuki C2 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Suzuki C2 (251 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2005 Ford Falcon. (210 HP @ 4900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Suzuki C2 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Falcon weights approximately 633 kg more than 1999 Suzuki C2.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Suzuki C2. (284 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Suzuki C2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Falcon | 1999 Suzuki C2 | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | Falcon | C2 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3984 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 251 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 357 Nm | 284 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 852 kg |
