2005 Ford Falcon vs. 2000 Audi TT
To start off, 2005 Ford Falcon is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi TT would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Falcon (200 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2000 Audi TT. (170 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Falcon weights approximately 301 kg more than 2000 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi TT. (235 Nm @ 1950 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Falcon | 2000 Audi TT | |
Make | Ford | Audi |
Model | Falcon | TT |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3984 cc | 1781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 357 Nm | 235 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1950 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92.4 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.3 mm | 86.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1581 kg | 1280 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 55 L |