2005 Ford Falcon vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU
To start off, 2005 Ford Falcon is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi SSU would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Falcon (200 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU weights approximately 324 kg more than 2005 Ford Falcon.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Falcon (357 Nm) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (240 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Falcon | 2000 Mitsubishi SSU | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Falcon | SSU |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3984 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 357 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1581 kg | 1905 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 71 L |
