2005 Ford Falcon vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2005 Ford Falcon is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Renault Megane would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Falcon (200 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 2003 Renault Megane. (134 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Megane.
Because 2005 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Falcon (357 Nm) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Megane. (188 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Falcon | 2003 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Falcon | Megane |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3984 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 134 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 357 Nm | 188 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 92.4 mm | 82.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 99.3 mm | 93 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2690 mm |
