2005 Ford Falcon vs. 2004 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2005 Ford Falcon is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Pathfinder. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Pathfinder would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder (240 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2005 Ford Falcon. (210 HP @ 4900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 271 kg more than 2005 Ford Falcon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder (372 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Falcon. (357 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Pathfinder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Falcon | 2004 Nissan Pathfinder | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Falcon | Pathfinder |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3984 cc | 3489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 357 Nm | 372 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92.4 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.3 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 1756 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 80 L |