2005 Ford Falcon vs. 2004 Peugeot 106
To start off, 2005 Ford Falcon is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Peugeot 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Peugeot 106 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Falcon (200 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 2004 Peugeot 106. (57 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2004 Peugeot 106. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Falcon weights approximately 701 kg more than 2004 Peugeot 106. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Peugeot 106, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Peugeot 106. (95 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Peugeot 106. 2005 Ford Falcon has automatic transmission and 2004 Peugeot 106 has manual transmission. 2004 Peugeot 106 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Ford Falcon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Falcon | 2004 Peugeot 106 | |
| Make | Ford | Peugeot |
| Model | Falcon | 106 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3984 cc | 1527 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 57 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 357 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 92.4 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 99.3 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 23.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1581 kg | 880 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 45 L |
