2005 Ford Falcon vs. 2005 Mazda Tribute
To start off, both 2005 Ford Falcon and 2005 Mazda Tribute were released in the same year (2005). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Falcon (200 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2005 Mazda Tribute. (154 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda Tribute. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Falcon weights approximately 102 kg more than 2005 Mazda Tribute. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Falcon (357 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda Tribute. (207 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Falcon | 2005 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Falcon | Tribute |
Year Released | 2005 | 2005 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3984 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 357 Nm | 207 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92.4 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.3 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.7:1 |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1581 kg | 1479 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 62 L |