2005 Ford Falcon vs. 2009 Volvo C30
To start off, 2009 Volvo C30 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Falcon (200 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2009 Volvo C30. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2009 Volvo C30.
Because 2005 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volvo C30. (240 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volvo C30.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Falcon | 2009 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Falcon | C30 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3984 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 357 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 18.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 70 L |