2005 Ford Falcon vs. 2010 Holden Cruze

To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Falcon (200 HP) has 61 more horse power than 2010 Holden Cruze. (139 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Cruze.

Because 2005 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Falcon (357 Nm) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Cruze. (176 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Cruze. 2005 Ford Falcon has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden Cruze has manual transmission. 2010 Holden Cruze will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Ford Falcon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: