2005 Ford Fiesta vs. 1968 Volvo 145
To start off, 2005 Ford Fiesta is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volvo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volvo 145 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Volvo 145 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Fiesta (101 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1968 Volvo 145. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Fiesta should accelerate faster than 1968 Volvo 145. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Volvo 145 weights approximately 102 kg more than 2005 Ford Fiesta.
Because 1968 Volvo 145 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Volvo 145. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Fiesta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Volvo 145 (157 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Fiesta. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1968 Volvo 145 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Fiesta.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Fiesta | 1968 Volvo 145 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Fiesta | 145 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1310 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2620 mm |