2005 Ford FPV BF GT vs. 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500
To start off, 2005 Ford FPV BF GT is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford FPV BF GT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Ford FPV BF GT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford FPV BF GT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford FPV BF GT (520 Nm) has 425 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500. (95 Nm). This means 2005 Ford FPV BF GT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500. 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 has automatic transmission and 2005 Ford FPV BF GT has manual transmission. 2005 Ford FPV BF GT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford FPV BF GT | 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | FPV BF GT | Mum 500 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5407 cc | 500 cc |
Horse Power | 389 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 520 Nm | 95 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |